Well, having a close friend who has for years been living under the umbrella of fear because of her stalkers I can tell you that it brings frequent bouts of uncontrollable crying. Frequent trips to the doctor and a general break down of one’s health. Stress has a tendency to do that; in fact stress may be the most single devastating condition of modern life in regards to general health. So when you add the stress of being stalked on to the general stress of everyday living it takes a superman to stand up under the pressure. You look over your shoulder even when there is nothing there; you see the whole world through the glasses of paranoia. You doubt your friends and wonder what day are they going to turn on you, there is no one to turn to, and you are alone. You move frequently just in general fear of being found because your stalker has made it very clear that they want you dead and they don’t care how it happens as long as it does happen. You are so preoccupied with what they are going to do or say next that it is impossible to accomplish anything else. Yes a cyber stalker is in some ways even more terrifying than a physical one. My friend Oma is justifiably in fear of her life given her background of living with a husband who wrote a book about how he was going to kill her, and enacted scenes from that book where he forced her into a execution position on the ground in front of him and shot at her with a loaded gun from point blank range… Hell, he even raped her with a loaded gun! Now couple this with her stalker telling her that he was going to have the Russian Red Mafia, quote, Shred Her To Pieces, and you can start to see why her fear is justified. Knowing that Oma was living in fear of an Ex who has a history of violence her stalkers published her physical address on the web. One can only assume that such an action was in hope that he would find Oma and destroy her for them. Her stalkers have published her Social Security number on the web; --- do you have any idea of what it is like to recover from having your identity stolen? She has suffered being tossed up against a wall and threatened because of her stalkers words; she was even raped while her attacker pummeled her spirit with words from her stalkers. Her stalkers know how this affects her as she has told them in requests to cease and desist how much this hurts her, yet even today they publish or allow to be published innuendos of we know where you live.

Unless you have experienced this living in fear every moment of every day you just cannot comprehend other than in a non visceral way what life is like to live in fear every moment, to have your whole life destroyed because of the words of your stalkers.

It is only by looking at the history of events that one can really comprehend the heinous behavior that is being exhibited by her stalkers even today. If one were to follow the cyber tracks you find that a web page came into existence as part of the Alexander Palace Time Machine web site, it told of Oma’s past history wherein she wrote some bad checks… but did not tell of how she made restitution, paid her debt to society and moved on with her life. The story that they presented was one of distortion, partial facts and truth twisted into lies. My first ever interaction with them was when I requested proof of their facts and found that what they said on the web page did not match what the facts actually said and I called them on it, to no avail. One has to understand this past history of how this information moved on to “free” web hosted sites and as the information violated the acceptable use policy the new sites were taken down about as fast as the newer ones went up saying exactly the same things; Oma is a bad person, do not do business with her, stay away from her, she was a criminal, she is now a criminal and will always be a criminal. As the sites changed from host to host that the one constant was a secret link that existed on the main page of the original web site telling the search engines how to find these pages, these pages that preached hate, and proclaimed no connection to her stalkers. The other key was in how these sites that decried how horrible Oma was, that still provided false and partial information, truths twisted into lies, also proclaimed that the original author had nothing to do with them, right up until we were able to secure a sign up log showing that indeed Oma’s stalkers were solidly behind them as the IP record linked firmly and absolutely without question back to her stalkers. This history continued on through an anonymous web site that in violation of the rules had an Admin who could not be contacted. The defamation and lies continued, until this site that had nothing to do with her stalkers, suddenly was absolutely identified as belonging to one of her stalkers, Rob Moshein. The same site that had proclaimed that there was no such link to Oma’s “old” stalkers, just as existing sites proclaim that there is no such link, so this site proclaimed no link, yet we find that Rob owned the domain name and after a court told him that he was in the wrong he proved that he did have control as he modified the contents in partial compliance with the courts warning. And as part of the pattern we still today have sites that Rob is proclaiming have nothing to do with him at all in any respect. Yet given years long patterns of behavior how can anyone believe this? Especially given the similarity of contents?

When one reads the comments on Rob’s current Blog, one comes away with the feeling that no this not just a fun play on words, but this is deadly continuing in history’s path. Do not do business with Oma! She is a Criminal! Notice the if-it-defends-Oma, it must be Oma mentality? Prompting Oma to ask me this in a email, “After reading several statements of Robert Mark Moshien I find myself asking myself why Rob would accuse me of stealing my friend, Tina’s identity just so I could post a comment on his blog.” In the past I have pointed out the principle of reversal where in you accuse the other of doing what you yourself do, so as to cause people to scurry off on the wrong trail. We have found a number of instances, more than enough to show a pattern, of Oma’s stalkers using a female identity to post about Oma, why should we believe that things have changed?

All this that is happening now is as it has been in past history. What I notice most is how Rob now declares that Oma is doing to him, what he has done to her for years. This is a very typical ploy in propaganda techniques; say that your opponent is doing to you what you are doing to them. Even today Rob practices selective truth, allowing posts/comments that make fun of Oma and that send innuendos of we know where you are, such that she is going to move yet again and at the same time showing his editorial privileges by deleting any positive or supporting comments, thus guiding the content to be a one sided continuing pattern of attack and hate of Oma.