Why? Because education is the only way we can go beyond our life experiences and modify the way we see the world and those around us. Remember the saying of “They see the world through Rose Colored glasses?“ Well this is because we do perceive things through the filter of our life experiences and we judge others because of what we see inside ourselves which is called the Principal of Reversal. In 90% of all cases when you read what someone else has to say about someone or thing you can reverse this to see inside the author.

The main points are that when someone says/writes that someone else “is” whatever --- then they are showing you the inside of their soul, but when someone says look at what so and so is “doing” then they are in the logical or analytical mode of thought and are showing you what their education is rather than what they are inside. When you see how someone “reacts” (typically short knee-jerk comments) to a situation you are seeing inside of their soul, when you see how they “respond” (typically more analytical and in depth explanations) to a situation you are seeing their education and experience.

There is always some crossing over, but if you have enough material you can use the long term patterns to see inside of the authors. The DISC Method of seeing personalities can help you understand basic personality, but the Big Five will really help you understand the Oma vs. Bob war. Typically emotionally laden words are keys to look inside someone, when they continually point out things that they see in others then typically you are seeing what they themselves have done or would do in the same situation.

The main reason I write what I do is to give you the knowledge and insight to understand the methods of propaganda and to properly evaluate what is being said by both sides in the Oma vs Bob War-of-Words. When you read/re-read what has been written by both sides look at what they say the other side “is.” Look at how they see the other side. Do they tell you “WHO” the other person/side IS? Or do they show you what the other side is “DOING?”

Which side typically uses emotionally laden speech and which uses logic? Which one tells you what to believe and which one leads to you question the whole situation and to ask yourself questions?

Simply put is easier to allow someone else to tell you how and what to think, than to become educated and decide for yourself. To follow the facts and make your own conclusions is much harder than accepting someone else’s conclusions…

That is I challenge you to think for yourself and evaluate what you see inside the different parties. It is time to ask yourself “why?”

Why do I post where my comments can be challenged? Yet while the Hate-Oma blog ASKS questions they DENY the ability to answer them, and when the answers have been given and they do not match what the other wants them to be they ignore the answers? Why do "They" use hate as a weapon?

Why do they attack the person and not the facts? Why do they tell you who I am, and who Oma IS? Yet on the other hand why do I tell you what they are “doing?” Which one respects you as a reader and allows you to form your own conclusions and asks you to think for your self?

Think it through, and ask your self --- WHY?
Even more, ask your self what do I see inside the various authors in this war of words.

Which one is using propaganda and which one education?
Which one is believable and trust worthy and honestly wants you to know the facts, leaving the conclusions up to you and which one is trying to control your mind?